Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U. CIN. L. REV. () [hereinafter Scalia,. Originalism]; Antonin Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. CHI. L. Justice Antonin Scalia’s sudden death in February, , was a great loss for his . 13 Antonin Scalia, Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U. CINN. L. REV. In this well-known article, Justice Scalia explains and defends originalism, which Type: Article; Author(s): Antonin Scalia; Date: ; Volume: 57; Issue:
|Published (Last):||12 December 2007|
|PDF File Size:||7.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Infact, It can be even said that he perhaps was not a true originalist like Justice Thomas.
Notably, while a major chunk of originalists stress on the theory of popular sovereignty, Justice Scalia developed and relied on theory of constitutional legitimacy. His departure to heaven is a big loss to the legal fraternity. Justice Scalia undeniably was the brightest judicial minds.
And anttonin, originalism as keeps his one firm hand in the past is not the correct approach for the future course. The minority opinion which based its logic in originalism was not supported by Scalia.
Scalia, even while proposing his constitutional legitimacy did not focus on legitimacy of judicial review for his approach. To sum up, Justice Scalia was not a true originalist in spirit and could never professed fearless originalism.
There are 3 main objections to Originalism. He wrote that the principal theoretical defect of non-originalism was its incompatibility with the very principle that legitimizes judicial review of constitutionality.
His most important and perhaps the most controversial work was the theory of Originalism as a tool of constitutional interpretation.
May his soul, Rest in Peace! In both these cases Justice Scalia dissented hhe the majority opinions using originalism. Scalia relied on this opinion to adopt methodology of proof by contradiction that non-originalism may have its benefits but the originalist approach was better.
Finally comparing the two diametrically opposite theories of constitutional interpretation, Scalia concluded that originalism was the better evil. In Kelo the Court upheld the use of eminent domain to take private property for the use of a private developer.
Scalia, 79, originalisn considered one of the most influential judges of the last quarter century and an expert in constitutional law. Namit Saxena is a lawyer and can be reached at namitsaxena gmail.
Originalism: The Lesser Evil Essay 57 University of Cincinnati Law Review
Chief Justice Marshall in the landmark case of Marbury v Madison held that if the law was to make any attempt at consistency and predictability, surely there must be general agreement not only that judges reject one exegetical approach originalism but that they adopt another.
Firstly, it is impractical as it is almost origonalism to accurately devise the true intentions of the number of framers. In Gonzalves on the other hand Justice Scalia joined the majority judgment in upholding the kesser of the Controlled Substances Act to persons who grew cannabis on their own property evill for their own medical use as recommended by their physicians and authorized by the State Law.
Scalia also noted that originalism is not devoid of defects and the primary impurity in it was the difficulty of applying it correctly.
S 52 ] to profess the originalist approach.